get our newsletter or

facebook

Twitter

SFGreenParty
At least #Ossoff seems to be coping with his loss. #GA06 pic.twitter.com/LqBrJ8nme7

22 hours ago

GreenPartyUS
The Democratic Party and its talking heads are really confused why this message didn't win tonight in Georgia. pic.twitter.com/eoFPSzEJOL

Retweeted 2 days ago

brucewolfe
One wld think, in city of its HQ would set an example. Nope. Refuse to underground wires, upgrade grid but grind us… twitter.com/i/web/status/8…

Retweeted 4 days ago

Lefebvre_Sam
Looks like a Justice for Philando Castile rally and March is coming together at Frank "Oscar Grant" Ogawa Plaza at… twitter.com/i/web/status/8…

Retweeted 5 days ago

SFGreenParty
Berniecrats often underestimate the difficulty of building a new party. Huge barriers have been put up by Dems & Rs! twitter.com/DraftBernie/st…

5 days ago

FitzTheReporter
Hey all, I'm on the radio today. Neat! 10am @yourcallradio #Uber #Lyft regulations bit.ly/2suKMd1 Join t… twitter.com/i/web/status/8…

Retweeted 1 week ago

AaronPeskin
10am today on KALW "Your Call": Regulating ride-hailing bit.ly/2suKMd1 Join convo w/ Joe Fitzgerald... fb.me/KYofQlCu

Retweeted 1 week ago

SFGreenParty
Strange that Dems left out the part where they had #SinglePayer activists arrested. twitter.com/RepJudyChu/sta…

1 week ago

SFGreenParty
Let's follow up with real regulation, not just shake them down for more fees. twitter.com/AaronPeskin/st…

1 week ago

 

Consensus

The SF Green Party uses the consensus process for making most of our decisions, including endorsements.  In the consensus process, we seek the agreement of a supermajority of participants, and also to resolve or mitigate the concerns of the minority in order to achieve the most agreeable decision.

The consensus process starts with a presentation of a proposal by one or more presenters.  After the presentation, the meeting facilitators take a "stack" of questions designed to clarify any parts of the proposal or facts concerning it that are not clear.  The facilitators alternate between calling on male and female participants ("gender stacking") and may call on people out of turn in order to encourage participants who have not previously spoken.

After the clarifying questions are answered, the facilitators take another stack of concerns and affirmations about the proposal.  People with concerns are encouraged to provide "friendly amendments" that will change the proposal to resolve or mitigate their concern; these amendments may be accepted at the option of the presenters.  All such actions are noted in the minutes.  When all concerns have been heard, the facilitators test for consensus.

If there are no remaining concerns that have not been resolved by friendly amendments, consensus is reached and the proposal passes.

If there are remaining concerns, the presenters may withdraw the proposal, or have the facilitators ask those people with concerns to "stand aside."  If all those with concerns agree to stand aside, the proposal still passes by consensus.

A person with a concern about the proposal may not agree to stand aside, especially if they feel that enacting the proposal would not be consistent with our Ten Key Values.  This is called a "blocking" concern.  If there are blocking concerns about a proposal, consensus is not reached.

In cases where we do not reach consensus, the presenters have the option of attempting to pass the proposal by supermajority vote.  Business decisions (i.e., carrying out an existing policy) require a 2/3 threshold, endorsements a 3/4 threshold, and adoption of new policies requires a 4/5 threshold.  Details of our voting procedure are given in our bylaws.